제주대학교 Repository

다면평가제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
Research for Improvement of Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System
Abstract
In order to examine the improvement of Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System, the local public servants in Jeju Special Self-Governing Provincial Office of Education have participated in a particular survey. The survey result reveals some negative aspects regarding the system. Based on this result, I have sought for ways to improve the current Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System and drawn some suggestions.
In July 1, 2006 Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and International Free City was established and the enforcement Ordinance for the Special Act was enacted. Since then, the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Office has decided to make drastic changes in its recruiting system in order to promote effectiveness and efficiency among public service personnel.
First, the application of sum total labor costsystem is excluded to ensure that recognizing individual ability is at the core of the personnel administration. Equipment installation and staff appropriation can be independently decided now. Also, all the divisions and subdivisions are integrated. The special system to appoint authority for each division is introduced and the phased execution of the Position Classification System is carried out. These transformations have strengthened professionalism among the public servants in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province. In order to establish the infrastructure that empowers the public servants to perform and compete effectively, it has transformed the supplemental personnel system and increased the number of open-ended positions and job postings.
Second, the fundamental structures of human resources management for public servants in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province employment regulation and personnel evaluation are revitalized to enhance human resources with legal foundations. Jeju has formulated its own Human Resources Development & Management System and is now working towards stabilizing the system all through the human resources department.
Regarding the content of Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System for public servants in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, there havebeen some improvements in the committee component ratio, mark scheme based on evaluation criteria, and reflective ratio of evaluation result to promotion.
Human Resources has an important function to accomplish organizational objectives.
To encounter the new age of ever-changing global world, it is necessary to bring out innovation in Human Resources Development and Management, which can resolve the problems of Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System as aforementioned. Without this compelling innovation, the organization cannot be revitalized with fruitful improvement. Successful Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System requires that individuals should be directly informed with their evaluation results. Therefore, it offers them a great opportunity to find their weaknesses and to revamp their knowledge, skills, and abilities. Not only does this encourage self-development, but also it promotes greater work efficiency and effectiveness. Particularly, it requires immediate action to vigorously utilize and systemize PPSS in order to ensure reliability in the Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System as well as rationality and clarity in the system operation.
In addition, Korea Customs Service should celebrate the introduction of Total Human Resources Development and Management that fosters best-qualified customs service officers. Also, it should exemplify successful cases that strategically demonstrate development of individual ability and improvement in task performance through recruiting, training, and maintaining human resources. Any improvement in the operation of Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province should be benchmarked as well.
It is significant to note that this privateresearch has limitation to investigate how public service personnel perceive Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System due to the lack of tangible and intangible resources.
The section 38. 5. 3 of the Regional Public Service Employment Act is revised to require that the evaluation conducted by the general public has to be applied and implemented to facilitate promotion among public service personnel under certain regulations and procedures.
Since January 2004, Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System has been operated for 3 years. Regardless of how great the system is, it will increase reliability and preserve the principle of the system if the system is continually inspected, updated, and adjusted for the better.
To overcome this limitation, it is essential that the operation department of the Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System develop and conduct practical surveys to investigate various perceptions towards the system with more realistic and detail-orientedresources.
This offers a productive way to find negative aspects and acts as a catalyst to generate positive transformations.
I hope that the Multiple Perspectives Evaluation System empowers public service personnel to develop and utilize their individual abilities to successfully achieve the organizational mission and objectives with assurance of the crucial components to evaluate individual work performance validity, reliability, acceptability, and practicality.
Author(s)
한관수
Issued Date
2007
Awarded Date
2007. 8
Type
Dissertation
URI
http://dcoll.jejunu.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000004084
Alternative Author(s)
Han,Kwan-Soo
Affiliation
제주대학교
Department
행정대학원 행정학과
Advisor
김성준
Table Of Contents
I. 서론 1
1. 연구의 목적 1
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 2
II. 다면평가제도의 배경 3
1. 다면평가제도의 의의 및 연혁 3
1) 다면평가의 의미 및 목적 3
2) 다면평가제도의 장․단점 5
3) 다면평가제도의 연혁 8
2. 다면평가제도의 운영 현황 9
1) 중앙정부의 운영 실태 9
2) 제주특별자치도교육감 소속 지방공무원 다면평가 운영 현황 17
3) 제주특별자치도 소속 지방공무원 다면평가 운영 현황 20
3. 선행연구의 검토 22
1) 외국의 선행연구 22
2) 국내의 선행연구 23
4. 연구분석의 틀 38
1) 종합인식 정도 38
2) 평가내적 타당성 요인 38
3) 평가외적 타당성 요인 40
III. 다면평가제도의 실증적 분석 43
1. 설문조사 및 분석방법 43
1) 설문조사의 방법 43
2) 분석방법 43
2. 조사자료의 분석과 설명 45
1) 일반적 현황 45
2) 변수들에 대한 설문분석 결과 48
3. 설문분석결과 종합 71
1) 종합인식 정도 71
2) 내적 타당성 요인 정도 71
3) 외적 타당성 요인 정도 73
4. 다면평가제도 운영 실태에 대한 비교 분석 75
1) 다면평가 제도개선에 대한 비교 분석 75
2) 다면평가제도 운영 실태에 대한 비교 분석 77
IV. 다면평가제도의 문제점 및 개선방안 79
1. 다면평가제도에 대한 문제점 79
2. 다면평가제도에 대한 개선방안 81
1) 다면평가 종합인식 정도에 대한 타당성 제고방안 81
2) 다면평가제도 내적 타당성 요인 정도에 대한 증대방안 86
3) 다면평가제도 외적 타당성 요인 정도에 대한 내실화 방안 89
V. 정책적 함의 및 연구의 요약 92
참고문헌 101
〈부록1〉설문지 104
Abstract 115
Degree
Master
Publisher
제주대학교
Citation
한관수. (2007). 다면평가제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구
Appears in Collections:
Public Administration > Local Self-Government
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.